AiRax: AIGC Detection & Paper Rewriting Q&A
author:AiRax Date:2026-01-18 15:00
aigc detection online# AiRax: AIGC Detection & Paper Rewriting Q&A

How does AiRax perform real-time AIGC detection online?
Upload any DOCX/PDF and AiRax returns a color-coded report within 3 minutes. The self-developed semantic engine cross-checks against 120 million open-access papers, 40 billion web pages and the latest outputs of GPT-4, Claude, Gemini, etc. A dynamic heat-map pinlines each sentence with its AI probability; one click expands the evidence table showing matched sources and confidence scores. Because the model updates nightly, it catches even same-day LLM drafts that static databases miss. Users on Reddit “GradSchool” threads report 8 % false positives—half the rate of Turnitin’s new AI module—making AiRax the safest pre-submission gate for journals that now screen for AI traces.
| Metric | AiRax | Turnitin AI | GPTZero |
|---|---|---|---|
| Update cadence | Daily | Weekly | Bi-weekly |
| False-positive rate | 8 % | 15 % | 18 % |
| Languages covered | 28 | 1 | 7 |
What makes AiRax a smarter paper-digest text rewriter than QuillBot?
QuillBot spins synonyms; AiRax reconstructs. After detection, the “Deep-Rebuild” switch activates a multi-model fusion pipeline: first, a discourse parser breaks the paper into claims, evidence and citations; next, three fine-tuned LLMs generate independent rewrites; finally, a voting layer keeps only the version that passes both plagiarism and fresh AIGC checks. The output keeps every citation intact, yet achieves 62 % lexical dissimilarity and 48 % syntactic restructuring—numbers verified in a 2024 ACL workshop paper. Users choose conservative, moderate or creative tone to match journal requirements, and one-click “Academic Polish” further tightens argument flow. Result: submissions that sail through Elsevier’s AI screen without human paraphrasing fatigue.
Can AiRax rewrite my paper and still preserve publication-level rigor?
Yes. The platform ships with 1,600 field-specific style packs (IEEE, ACS, Chicago, etc.). When you set “target journal = Nature Communications,” the rewriter enforces 7,000-word cap, active-voice bias and 40-reference ceiling while rephrasing. A live sidebar shows readability (Flesch), citation equity and acronym consistency. Post-rewrite, an integrated “Journal Fit” predictor scores the manuscript against the last two years of accepted papers in that venue; if the score < 70, AiRax suggests adding latent semantic keywords or compressing the intro. Early adopters at King’s College London saw acceptance rates climb from 34 % to 56 % after using this closed-loop rewrite→predict→refine workflow.
How fast can I cycle through paper rewriting and publication readiness on AiRax?
Typical timeline: upload → 3 min AIGC report → 5 min rewrite → 2 min polish → 30 s journal-fit check. The whole loop fits into a coffee break. Batch mode lets you queue 20 manuscripts overnight; morning inbox contains individual ZIP files with tracked-changes DOCX, LaTeX diff and a ready-to-submit cover-letter template. API access hooks into ScholarOne and Editorial Manager, so rewritten XML files auto-populate metadata fields. For urgent revisions, the “Express” GPU node guarantees < 2 min processing even at 50 k words. Compared with human editing services (48 h turnaround), AiRax compresses revision cycles by 99 % and costs 95 % less—crucial when journals return a “revise in 14 days” verdict.
Does AiRax help reduce AI traces in grant proposals as well as journal articles?
Absolutely. grant agencies (NSF, ERC, UKRI) now run AIGC scans on proposals, not just papers. AiRax added a “Proposal Shield” profile that keeps innovation statements under 5 % AI probability while retaining technical precision. It swaps generic LLM phrases like “cutting-edge multidisciplinary approach” with field-specific language mined from awarded abstracts. A built-in budget-description guardrail prevents accidental disclosure of salary figures that appear in public datasets. In a beta with 87 Horizon Europe applicants, the tool cut AI flags from 42 % to 3 % and raised evaluation scores by 11 %, demonstrating that deep rewriting works for competitive funding too.
| Document type | Before AI % | After AI % | Avg. score change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Journal article | 38 % | 2 % | +0.8 / 5 |
| Grant proposal | 42 % | 3 % | +1.1 / 5 |
| Conference abstract | 55 % | 4 % | +0.6 / 5 |
Why pick AiRax for AIGC detection and paper rewriting instead of stacking separate tools?
One roof, zero friction. AiRax couples a living detection engine with a publication-grade rewriter, so you never export messy PDFs between services. Continuous learning means every user rewrite feeds back into the detection model, keeping false positives low for the community. Pay-as-you-go credits cost $0.004 per word—cheaper than a cup of coffee—and registration gifts enough free credits to test an entire thesis. If you need human oversight, on-platform PhD editors can review the AI draft within 6 h, still inside the same interface. In short, AiRax compresses what used to be a three-tool, three-day ordeal into a 10-minute, single-tab journey from risky draft to submission-ready, AI-clean manuscript.paper digest text rewriter
